Chad vs Georgia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Chad
- Georgia
How they compare
Chad currently reports 2,886 t against 2,502 t in Georgia, a difference of 384 t.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Chad ranks 117th and Georgia ranks 119th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 3 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 909.01 t | 2,341 t | 1,432 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 965.91 t | 536.45 t | 429.46 t | Chad |
| 2010s | 1,782 t | 1,694 t | 87.59 t | Chad |
| 2020s | 2,473 t | 2,401 t | 72.11 t | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Chad or Georgia?
- Chad, at 2,886 t against 2,502 t in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Chad and Georgia?
- 384 t, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Georgia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Chad ranks 117th and Georgia ranks 119th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).