Colombia vs Czechoslovakia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Colombia
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 80,365 t against 75,000 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 5,365 t.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Czechoslovakia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 27th and Czechoslovakia ranks 29th of 185 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20,765 t | 245,433 t | 224,668 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 30,617 t | 417,832 t | 387,215 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 41,113 t | 497,312 t | 456,199 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 50,271 t | 169,967 t | 119,696 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Colombia or Czechoslovakia?
- Colombia, at 80,365 t against 75,000 t in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Colombia and Czechoslovakia?
- 5,365 t, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Colombia and Czechoslovakia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Colombia ranks 27th and Czechoslovakia ranks 29th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).