Congo vs Liberia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Congo
- Liberia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 607.35 t against 436 t in Congo, a difference of 171.35 t.
That makes Liberia's figure about 1.4 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liberia ahead.
Congo ranks 149th and Liberia ranks 146th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Liberia in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 43.6 t | 130.8 t | 87.2 t | Liberia |
| 1970s | 51.84 t | 352.03 t | 300.19 t | Liberia |
| 1980s | 77.76 t | 263.3 t | 185.54 t | Liberia |
| 1990s | 345.05 t | 124.04 t | 221.01 t | Congo |
| 2000s | 138.74 t | 283.92 t | 145.19 t | Liberia |
| 2010s | 103.24 t | 622.39 t | 519.15 t | Liberia |
| 2020s | 392.62 t | 724.09 t | 331.47 t | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Congo or Liberia?
- Liberia, at 607.35 t against 436 t in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Congo and Liberia?
- 171.35 t, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Liberia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Liberia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Congo ranks 149th and Liberia ranks 146th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).