Côte d'Ivoire vs Czechoslovakia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 75,000 t against 27,294 t in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 47,706 t.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 2.7 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 27th and Czechoslovakia ranks 29th of 29 groups.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 772.01 t | 245,433 t | 244,661 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 2,370 t | 417,832 t | 415,462 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 3,505 t | 497,312 t | 493,806 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 3,735 t | 169,967 t | 166,232 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Côte d'Ivoire or Czechoslovakia?
- Czechoslovakia, at 75,000 t against 27,294 t in Côte d'Ivoire as of 1992.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Côte d'Ivoire and Czechoslovakia?
- 47,706 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Czechoslovakia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 27th and Czechoslovakia ranks 29th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).