Czechia vs Honduras: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Czechia
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 16,029 t against 15,442 t in Czechia, a difference of 587 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 64th and Honduras ranks 62nd of 185 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21,485 t | 8,159 t | 13,326 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 19,559 t | 6,247 t | 13,312 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 20,061 t | 13,212 t | 6,849 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 16,152 t | 15,274 t | 877.82 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Czechia or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 16,029 t against 15,442 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Czechia and Honduras?
- 587 t, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Honduras?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Honduras rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Czechia ranks 64th and Honduras ranks 62nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).