Czechia vs Lithuania: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Czechia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 15,442 t against 14,692 t in Lithuania, a difference of 750 t.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 69th and Lithuania ranks 70th of 201 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21,485 t | 6,358 t | 15,127 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 19,559 t | 10,190 t | 9,369 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 20,061 t | 15,597 t | 4,464 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 16,152 t | 16,010 t | 142.18 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Czechia or Lithuania?
- Czechia, at 15,442 t against 14,692 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Czechia and Lithuania?
- 750 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Lithuania?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Lithuania rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Czechia ranks 69th and Lithuania ranks 70th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).