Dominica vs Eritrea: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Dominica
- Eritrea
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Eritrea, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Dominica ahead.
Dominica ranks 175th and Eritrea ranks 175th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 2 and Eritrea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 472.37 t | 611.65 t | 139.27 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 186.83 t | 559.08 t | 372.26 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 99.76 t | 69.28 t | 30.48 t | Dominica |
| 2020s | 48.94 t | 0 t | 48.94 t | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Dominica or Eritrea?
- Dominica, at 0 t against 0 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Dominica and Eritrea?
- 0 t, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Eritrea rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Dominica ranks 175th and Eritrea ranks 175th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).