Ecuador vs Kazakhstan, Republic of: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ecuador
- Kazakhstan, Republic of
How they compare
Kazakhstan, Republic of currently reports 14,671 t against 14,508 t in Ecuador, a difference of 163 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan, Republic of ahead.
Ecuador ranks 67th and Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 66th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Kazakhstan, Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kazakhstan, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12,072 t | 39,033 t | 26,961 t | Kazakhstan, Republic of |
| 2000s | 16,318 t | 4,827 t | 11,492 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 19,598 t | 11,238 t | 8,361 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 19,127 t | 17,416 t | 1,710 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Ecuador or Kazakhstan, Republic of?
- Kazakhstan, Republic of, at 14,671 t against 14,508 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Ecuador and Kazakhstan, Republic of?
- 163 t, with Kazakhstan, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kazakhstan, Republic of?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Kazakhstan, Republic of rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Ecuador ranks 67th and Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 66th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).