Egypt vs Mexico: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Egypt
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 180,381 t against 154,954 t in Egypt, a difference of 25,427 t.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.2 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 16th and Mexico ranks 15th of 186 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 18,746 t | 31,669 t | 12,923 t | Mexico |
| 1970s | 29,557 t | 81,660 t | 52,102 t | Mexico |
| 1980s | 70,717 t | 146,726 t | 76,009 t | Mexico |
| 1990s | 57,613 t | 121,377 t | 63,764 t | Mexico |
| 2000s | 74,252 t | 124,368 t | 50,116 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 99,881 t | 152,213 t | 52,332 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 136,136 t | 175,678 t | 39,542 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Egypt or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 180,381 t against 154,954 t in Egypt as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Egypt and Mexico?
- 25,427 t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Mexico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Mexico rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Egypt ranks 16th and Mexico ranks 15th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).