Ethiopia PDR vs Paraguay: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Paraguay
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 65,786 t against 58,000 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 7,786 t.
That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia PDR's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 34th and Paraguay ranks 32nd of 186 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,611 t | 511.33 t | 1,100 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 12,926 t | 607.22 t | 12,318 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 29,720 t | 2,586 t | 27,134 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 44,200 t | 5,694 t | 38,506 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Ethiopia PDR or Paraguay?
- Paraguay, at 65,786 t against 58,000 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Ethiopia PDR and Paraguay?
- 7,786 t, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Paraguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Paraguay rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 34th and Paraguay ranks 32nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).