Fiji vs Sierra Leone: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Fiji
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 380.19 t against 360.14 t in Fiji, a difference of 20.05 t.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Fiji ranks 142nd and Sierra Leone ranks 141st of 185 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 335.33 t | 202.4 t | 132.93 t | Fiji |
| 1970s | 783.54 t | 333.19 t | 450.34 t | Fiji |
| 1980s | 1,960 t | 276.51 t | 1,683 t | Fiji |
| 1990s | 1,295 t | 267.27 t | 1,028 t | Fiji |
| 2000s | 332.45 t | 99.5 t | 232.95 t | Fiji |
| 2010s | 504.1 t | 280 t | 224.1 t | Fiji |
| 2020s | 863.17 t | 380.19 t | 482.98 t | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Fiji or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 380.19 t against 360.14 t in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Fiji and Sierra Leone?
- 20.05 t, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Sierra Leone?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Sierra Leone rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Fiji ranks 142nd and Sierra Leone ranks 141st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).