Haiti vs Mauritius: Mineral fertilizers β Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Haiti
- Mauritius
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 889.44 t against 446.9 t in Mauritius, a difference of 442.54 t.
That makes Haiti's figure about 2.0 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.
Haiti ranks 132nd and Mauritius ranks 135th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 13.08 t | 2,074 t | 2,061 t | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 166.2 t | 1,311 t | 1,145 t | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 274.68 t | 1,608 t | 1,333 t | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 460.02 t | 2,192 t | 1,732 t | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 1,179 t | 2,009 t | 829.21 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 6,595 t | 1,578 t | 5,017 t | Haiti |
| 2020s | 1,413 t | 769.87 t | 643.54 t | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers β cropland phosphorus, Haiti or Mauritius?
- Haiti, at 889.44 t against 446.9 t in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers β cropland phosphorus between Haiti and Mauritius?
- 442.54 t, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Mauritius?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Mauritius rank globally for mineral fertilizers β cropland phosphorus?
- Haiti ranks 132nd and Mauritius ranks 135th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).