Hungary vs Zimbabwe: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Hungary
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 22,081 t against 20,211 t in Hungary, a difference of 1,870 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 57th and Zimbabwe ranks 55th of 185 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 55,227 t | 8,480 t | 46,746 t | Hungary |
| 1970s | 150,980 t | 16,943 t | 134,037 t | Hungary |
| 1980s | 160,609 t | 18,416 t | 142,193 t | Hungary |
| 1990s | 22,454 t | 17,954 t | 4,500 t | Hungary |
| 2000s | 26,621 t | 11,853 t | 14,768 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 32,345 t | 16,660 t | 15,685 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 32,971 t | 23,996 t | 8,974 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Hungary or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 22,081 t against 20,211 t in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Hungary and Zimbabwe?
- 1,870 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Zimbabwe rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Hungary ranks 57th and Zimbabwe ranks 55th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).