Japan vs Malaysia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Japan
- Malaysia
How they compare
Japan currently reports 102,460 t against 95,626 t in Malaysia, a difference of 6,834 t.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 22nd and Malaysia ranks 24th of 185 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 252,173 t | 17,937 t | 234,236 t | Japan |
| 1970s | 315,932 t | 29,352 t | 286,580 t | Japan |
| 1980s | 320,569 t | 57,356 t | 263,213 t | Japan |
| 1990s | 282,593 t | 85,369 t | 197,225 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 201,223 t | 87,732 t | 113,491 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 155,153 t | 114,054 t | 41,098 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 123,045 t | 99,876 t | 23,169 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Japan or Malaysia?
- Japan, at 102,460 t against 95,626 t in Malaysia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Japan and Malaysia?
- 6,834 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Malaysia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Malaysia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Japan ranks 22nd and Malaysia ranks 24th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).