Japan vs South Africa: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Japan
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 105,868 t against 102,460 t in Japan, a difference of 3,408 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 21st of 186 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 252,173 t | 79,956 t | 172,217 t | Japan |
| 1970s | 315,932 t | 139,473 t | 176,459 t | Japan |
| 1980s | 320,569 t | 151,829 t | 168,740 t | Japan |
| 1990s | 282,593 t | 97,586 t | 185,008 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 201,223 t | 77,857 t | 123,366 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 155,153 t | 98,673 t | 56,480 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 123,045 t | 119,810 t | 3,235 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Japan or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 105,868 t against 102,460 t in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Japan and South Africa?
- 3,408 t, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and South Africa?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Japan and South Africa rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Japan ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 21st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).