Kazakhstan vs Malawi: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Kazakhstan
- Malawi
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 14,671 t against 14,153 t in Malawi, a difference of 518 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 66th and Malawi ranks 68th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 39,033 t | 5,883 t | 33,150 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 4,827 t | 7,909 t | 3,083 t | Malawi |
| 2010s | 11,238 t | 8,452 t | 2,786 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 17,416 t | 13,762 t | 3,654 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Kazakhstan or Malawi?
- Kazakhstan, at 14,671 t against 14,153 t in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Kazakhstan and Malawi?
- 518 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Malawi?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Malawi rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Kazakhstan ranks 66th and Malawi ranks 68th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).