Kiribati vs Mongolia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Kiribati
- Mongolia
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Mongolia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mongolia ahead.
Kiribati ranks 191st and Mongolia ranks 191st of 201 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 174.4 t | 174.4 t | Mongolia |
| 1970s | 0 t | 1,064 t | 1,064 t | Mongolia |
| 1980s | 0 t | 1,461 t | 1,461 t | Mongolia |
| 1990s | 0 t | 724.5 t | 724.5 t | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0.654 t | 103.79 t | 103.14 t | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 2.09 t | 213.38 t | 211.29 t | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.218 t | 109.16 t | 108.95 t | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Kiribati or Mongolia?
- Kiribati, at 0 t against 0 t in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Kiribati and Mongolia?
- 0 t, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Mongolia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Mongolia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Kiribati ranks 191st and Mongolia ranks 191st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).