Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Yugoslav SFR: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
482,868 t
in 2023
Yugoslav SFR
139,000 t
in 1991
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
8th
Yugoslav SFR rank
17th

Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Yugoslav SFR
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 482,868 t against 139,000 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 343,868 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 3.5 times Yugoslav SFR's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 17th of 10 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Yugoslav SFR Difference Ahead
1960s 226,174 t 142,053 t 84,120 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1970s 500,710 t 194,844 t 305,866 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 824,903 t 255,201 t 569,702 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 700,359 t 167,550 t 532,809 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Yugoslav SFR?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 482,868 t against 139,000 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Yugoslav SFR?
343,868 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Yugoslav SFR?
31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 17th of 10 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Yugoslav SFR: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-phosphorus/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/yugoslav-sfr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-phosphorus/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/yugoslav-sfr/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Yugoslav SFR: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,497 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).