Latvia vs Nepal: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Latvia
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 12,219 t against 12,193 t in Latvia, a difference of 26 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 73rd and Nepal ranks 72nd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,847 t | 10,944 t | 6,096 t | Nepal |
| 2000s | 5,514 t | 4,701 t | 812.92 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 10,812 t | 17,605 t | 6,793 t | Nepal |
| 2020s | 13,064 t | 21,265 t | 8,201 t | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Latvia or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 12,219 t against 12,193 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Latvia and Nepal?
- 26 t, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nepal?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Nepal rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Latvia ranks 73rd and Nepal ranks 72nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).