Lesotho, Kingdom of vs Montenegro: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Lesotho, Kingdom of
- Montenegro
How they compare
Lesotho, Kingdom of currently reports 225.41 t against 207.1 t in Montenegro, a difference of 18.31 t.
That makes Lesotho, Kingdom of's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Lesotho, Kingdom of ranks 146th and Montenegro ranks 147th of 185 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho, Kingdom of | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 211.57 t | 283.29 t | 71.72 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 175.93 t | 238.19 t | 62.26 t | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 173.64 t | 240.34 t | 66.71 t | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Lesotho, Kingdom of or Montenegro?
- Lesotho, Kingdom of, at 225.41 t against 207.1 t in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Lesotho, Kingdom of and Montenegro?
- 18.31 t, with Lesotho, Kingdom of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho, Kingdom of and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho, Kingdom of and Montenegro rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Lesotho, Kingdom of ranks 146th and Montenegro ranks 147th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).