Lesotho vs Suriname: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Lesotho
- Suriname
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 225.41 t against 204.7 t in Suriname, a difference of 20.71 t.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 146th and Suriname ranks 148th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 5 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 190.05 t | 39.58 t | 150.47 t | Lesotho |
| 1970s | 667.52 t | 144.62 t | 522.89 t | Lesotho |
| 1980s | 1,661 t | 373.52 t | 1,288 t | Lesotho |
| 1990s | 1,220 t | 105.94 t | 1,114 t | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 462.29 t | 427.18 t | 35.11 t | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 175.93 t | 462.07 t | 286.15 t | Suriname |
| 2020s | 173.64 t | 265.52 t | 91.89 t | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Lesotho or Suriname?
- Lesotho, at 225.41 t against 204.7 t in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Lesotho and Suriname?
- 20.71 t, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Lesotho and Suriname rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Lesotho ranks 146th and Suriname ranks 148th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).