Libya vs Slovak Republic: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Libya
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Slovak Republic currently reports 8,857 t against 8,636 t in Libya, a difference of 221 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 83rd and Slovak Republic ranks 81st of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 3 and Slovak Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19,545 t | 7,610 t | 11,935 t | Libya |
| 2000s | 9,977 t | 8,220 t | 1,757 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 11,049 t | 8,960 t | 2,089 t | Libya |
| 2020s | 6,288 t | 9,591 t | 3,303 t | Slovak Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Libya or Slovak Republic?
- Slovak Republic, at 8,857 t against 8,636 t in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Libya and Slovak Republic?
- 221 t, with Slovak Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Slovak Republic?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Slovak Republic rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Libya ranks 83rd and Slovak Republic ranks 81st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).