Mexico vs Republic of Moldova: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Mexico
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 180,381 t against 7,468 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 172,913 t.
That makes Mexico's figure about 24.2 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 15th and Republic of Moldova ranks 12th of 186 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 114,752 t | 11,271 t | 103,482 t | Mexico |
| 2000s | 124,368 t | 322.18 t | 124,046 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 152,213 t | 6,360 t | 145,853 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 175,678 t | 7,887 t | 167,790 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Mexico or Republic of Moldova?
- Mexico, at 180,381 t against 7,468 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Mexico and Republic of Moldova?
- 172,913 t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Republic of Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Republic of Moldova rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Mexico ranks 15th and Republic of Moldova ranks 12th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).