Mozambique vs Rwanda: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Mozambique
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 7,156 t against 7,141 t in Mozambique, a difference of 15 t.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 86th and Rwanda ranks 85th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 327.87 t | 13.76 t | 314.11 t | Mozambique |
| 1970s | 1,458 t | 28.86 t | 1,429 t | Mozambique |
| 1980s | 2,220 t | 100.67 t | 2,119 t | Mozambique |
| 1990s | 475.24 t | 185.3 t | 289.94 t | Mozambique |
| 2000s | 1,379 t | 612.23 t | 766.71 t | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 2,068 t | 2,647 t | 578.97 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 4,032 t | 7,578 t | 3,546 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Mozambique or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 7,156 t against 7,141 t in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Mozambique and Rwanda?
- 15 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mozambique and Rwanda rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Mozambique ranks 86th and Rwanda ranks 85th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).