Mozambique vs Sudan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Mozambique
- Sudan
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 7,141 t against 7,010 t in Sudan, a difference of 131 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Mozambique ranks 86th and Sudan ranks 87th of 185 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2,037 t | 9,123 t | 7,086 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 4,032 t | 8,955 t | 4,923 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Mozambique or Sudan?
- Mozambique, at 7,141 t against 7,010 t in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Mozambique and Sudan?
- 131 t, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Mozambique and Sudan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Mozambique ranks 86th and Sudan ranks 87th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).