Nigeria vs Tunisia: Mineral fertilizers β Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Nigeria
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 26,988 t against 22,620 t in Nigeria, a difference of 4,368 t.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times Nigeria's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.
Nigeria ranks 54th and Tunisia ranks 52nd of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 4 and Tunisia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,062 t | 6,502 t | 5,441 t | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 7,017 t | 9,813 t | 2,796 t | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 35,854 t | 19,846 t | 16,008 t | Nigeria |
| 1990s | 29,952 t | 18,426 t | 11,525 t | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 18,191 t | 19,097 t | 905.82 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 33,314 t | 23,006 t | 10,308 t | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 35,814 t | 24,351 t | 11,464 t | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers β cropland phosphorus, Nigeria or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 26,988 t against 22,620 t in Nigeria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers β cropland phosphorus between Nigeria and Tunisia?
- 4,368 t, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Nigeria and Tunisia rank globally for mineral fertilizers β cropland phosphorus?
- Nigeria ranks 54th and Tunisia ranks 52nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).