South Sudan vs Tonga: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- South Sudan
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 5.23 t against 1.74 t in South Sudan, a difference of 3.49 t.
That makes Tonga's figure about 3.0 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Tonga ahead.
South Sudan ranks 173rd and Tonga ranks 170th of 186 countries.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.32 t | 22.4 t | 13.08 t | Tonga |
| 2020s | 4.91 t | 19.07 t | 14.17 t | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, South Sudan or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 5.23 t against 1.74 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between South Sudan and Tonga?
- 3.49 t, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Tonga?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Tonga rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- South Sudan ranks 173rd and Tonga ranks 170th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).