Southern Africa vs Uzbekistan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Southern Africa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Southern Africa currently reports 109,605 t against 78,429 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 31,176 t.
That makes Southern Africa's figure about 1.4 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Southern Africa ranks 25th and Uzbekistan ranks 28th of 29 groups.
Southern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Southern Africa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 98,257 t | 71,586 t | 26,671 t | Southern Africa |
| 2000s | 79,660 t | 56,928 t | 22,732 t | Southern Africa |
| 2010s | 101,027 t | 64,130 t | 36,897 t | Southern Africa |
| 2020s | 122,766 t | 62,560 t | 60,205 t | Southern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Southern Africa or Uzbekistan?
- Southern Africa, at 109,605 t against 78,429 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Southern Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 31,176 t, with Southern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Southern Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Southern Africa ranks 25th and Uzbekistan ranks 28th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).