Spain vs Yugoslav SFR: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Spain
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 139,000 t against 127,416 t in Spain, a difference of 11,584 t.
That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 1.1 times Spain's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Spain ahead.
Spain ranks 18th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 17th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Spain averaged higher in 3 and Yugoslav SFR in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Spain | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 147,287 t | 142,053 t | 5,234 t | Spain |
| 1970s | 203,788 t | 194,844 t | 8,944 t | Spain |
| 1980s | 203,440 t | 255,201 t | 51,761 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 225,926 t | 167,550 t | 58,376 t | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Spain or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 139,000 t against 127,416 t in Spain as of 1991.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Spain and Yugoslav SFR?
- 11,584 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Spain and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Spain ranks 18th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 17th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).