Sudan (former) vs Uzbekistan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Sudan (former)
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 78,429 t against 69,150 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 9,279 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Sudan (former)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Sudan (former) ranks 31st and Uzbekistan ranks 28th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sudan (former) averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan (former) | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14,200 t | 71,586 t | 57,386 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 13,267 t | 56,928 t | 43,661 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 69,150 t | 64,429 t | 4,721 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Sudan (former) or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 78,429 t against 69,150 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Sudan (former) and Uzbekistan?
- 9,279 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan (former) and Uzbekistan?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Sudan (former) and Uzbekistan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Sudan (former) ranks 31st and Uzbekistan ranks 28th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).