Thailand vs Yugoslav SFR: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Thailand
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 240,573 t against 139,000 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 101,573 t.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.7 times Yugoslav SFR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Thailand ranks 14th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 17th of 186 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Thailand | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,435 t | 142,053 t | 131,619 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 34,976 t | 194,844 t | 159,869 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 61,097 t | 255,201 t | 194,104 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 128,755 t | 167,550 t | 38,795 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Thailand or Yugoslav SFR?
- Thailand, at 240,573 t against 139,000 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Thailand and Yugoslav SFR?
- 101,573 t, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Thailand and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Thailand ranks 14th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 17th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).