Afghanistan vs Ethiopia PDR: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Afghanistan
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0.0102 kg/ha against 0.0076 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0.0026 kg/ha.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.3 times Ethiopia PDR's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 173rd and Ethiopia PDR ranks 174th of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Ethiopia PDR in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0076 kg/ha | 0.0121 kg/ha | 0.0045 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 0.0167 kg/ha | 0.0099 kg/ha | 0.0068 kg/ha | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Afghanistan or Ethiopia PDR?
- Afghanistan, at 0.0102 kg/ha against 0.0076 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Afghanistan and Ethiopia PDR?
- 0.0026 kg/ha, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Ethiopia PDR?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 1983.
- How do Afghanistan and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Afghanistan ranks 173rd and Ethiopia PDR ranks 174th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).