Antigua and Barbuda vs Ethiopia PDR: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 0.0076 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.0076 kg/ha.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 177th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 174th of 186 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 3.18 kg/ha | 0.0121 kg/ha | 3.17 kg/ha | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 1980s | 3.18 kg/ha | 0.0099 kg/ha | 3.17 kg/ha | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Antigua and Barbuda or Ethiopia PDR?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 0.0076 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Antigua and Barbuda as of 1983.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Antigua and Barbuda and Ethiopia PDR?
- 0.0076 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Ethiopia PDR?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 1983.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 177th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 174th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).