Azerbaijan vs Barbados: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Azerbaijan
- Barbados
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 3.63 kg/ha against 3.63 kg/ha in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Barbados ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 125th and Barbados ranks 124th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Barbados in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Barbados | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.3 kg/ha | 49.2 kg/ha | 47.9 kg/ha | Barbados |
| 2000s | 0.8932 kg/ha | 12.62 kg/ha | 11.73 kg/ha | Barbados |
| 2010s | 1.81 kg/ha | 14.31 kg/ha | 12.5 kg/ha | Barbados |
| 2020s | 3.74 kg/ha | 3.68 kg/ha | 0.0602 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Azerbaijan or Barbados?
- Barbados, at 3.63 kg/ha against 3.63 kg/ha in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Azerbaijan and Barbados?
- 0 kg/ha, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Barbados?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Barbados rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Azerbaijan ranks 125th and Barbados ranks 124th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).