Belarus vs Ireland: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Belarus
- Ireland
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 63.01 kg/ha against 57.79 kg/ha in Belarus, a difference of 5.22 kg/ha.
That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ireland ahead.
Belarus ranks 13th and Ireland ranks 11th of 186 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 47.57 kg/ha | 121.84 kg/ha | 74.28 kg/ha | Ireland |
| 2000s | 58.45 kg/ha | 69.28 kg/ha | 10.83 kg/ha | Ireland |
| 2010s | 64.07 kg/ha | 72.49 kg/ha | 8.42 kg/ha | Ireland |
| 2020s | 56.35 kg/ha | 79.72 kg/ha | 23.38 kg/ha | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Belarus or Ireland?
- Ireland, at 63.01 kg/ha against 57.79 kg/ha in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Belarus and Ireland?
- 5.22 kg/ha, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ireland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Ireland rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Belarus ranks 13th and Ireland ranks 11th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).