Bhutan vs Tajikistan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Bhutan
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 1.16 kg/ha against 1.02 kg/ha in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.14 kg/ha.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 149th and Tajikistan ranks 151st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4596 kg/ha | 3.43 kg/ha | 2.97 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 0.8619 kg/ha | 0.9726 kg/ha | 0.1108 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 1.52 kg/ha | 0.5064 kg/ha | 1.01 kg/ha | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 1.44 kg/ha | 1.74 kg/ha | 0.3048 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Bhutan or Tajikistan?
- Bhutan, at 1.16 kg/ha against 1.02 kg/ha in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Bhutan and Tajikistan?
- 0.14 kg/ha, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Tajikistan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Bhutan ranks 149th and Tajikistan ranks 151st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).