Botswana vs Slovakia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Botswana
- Slovakia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 10.27 kg/ha against 9.42 kg/ha in Slovakia, a difference of 0.85 kg/ha.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Slovakia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovakia ahead.
Botswana ranks 84th and Slovakia ranks 87th of 186 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3698 kg/ha | 8.33 kg/ha | 7.96 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 1.72 kg/ha | 9.27 kg/ha | 7.55 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 2.81 kg/ha | 10.07 kg/ha | 7.26 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 5.59 kg/ha | 11.59 kg/ha | 6 kg/ha | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Botswana or Slovakia?
- Botswana, at 10.27 kg/ha against 9.42 kg/ha in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Botswana and Slovakia?
- 0.85 kg/ha, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Slovakia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Botswana ranks 84th and Slovakia ranks 87th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).