Brazil vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area

Brazil
106.65 kg/ha
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
4.38 kg/ha
in 2023
Brazil rank
5th
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
20th

Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Brazil
  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
0255075100196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 106.65 kg/ha against 4.38 kg/ha in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), a difference of 102.27 kg/ha.

That makes Brazil's figure about 24.4 times Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 5th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 20th of 186 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 2.77 kg/ha 0.9199 kg/ha 1.85 kg/ha Brazil
1970s 11.83 kg/ha 1.57 kg/ha 10.26 kg/ha Brazil
1980s 15.29 kg/ha 2.54 kg/ha 12.75 kg/ha Brazil
1990s 28.29 kg/ha 2.16 kg/ha 26.13 kg/ha Brazil
2000s 49.37 kg/ha 2.35 kg/ha 47.01 kg/ha Brazil
2010s 71.4 kg/ha 3.69 kg/ha 67.7 kg/ha Brazil
2020s 99.4 kg/ha 4.37 kg/ha 95.02 kg/ha Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Brazil or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
Brazil, at 106.65 kg/ha against 4.38 kg/ha in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Brazil and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
102.27 kg/ha, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
Brazil ranks 5th and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 20th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/brazil/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/brazil/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/">Brazil vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,440 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).