Cabo Verde vs Montenegro: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cabo Verde
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 27.96 kg/ha against 0.3996 kg/ha in Cabo Verde, a difference of 27.56 kg/ha.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 70.0 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Montenegro ranks 33rd of 29 groups.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5292 kg/ha | 35.63 kg/ha | 35.1 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 0.1449 kg/ha | 30.96 kg/ha | 30.81 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 0.4957 kg/ha | 32.32 kg/ha | 31.82 kg/ha | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Cabo Verde or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 27.96 kg/ha against 0.3996 kg/ha in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Cabo Verde and Montenegro?
- 27.56 kg/ha, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Montenegro rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Montenegro ranks 33rd of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).