Chile vs Guatemala: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area

Chile
20.1 kg/ha
in 2023
Guatemala
22.17 kg/ha
in 2023
Chile rank
45th
Guatemala rank
42nd

Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Chile
  • Guatemala
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 22.17 kg/ha against 20.1 kg/ha in Chile, a difference of 2.07 kg/ha.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 45th and Guatemala ranks 42nd of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Guatemala in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 1.84 kg/ha 1.44 kg/ha 0.4023 kg/ha Chile
1970s 1.82 kg/ha 6.24 kg/ha 4.43 kg/ha Guatemala
1980s 2.74 kg/ha 6.41 kg/ha 3.66 kg/ha Guatemala
1990s 12.46 kg/ha 11.67 kg/ha 0.7884 kg/ha Chile
2000s 15.99 kg/ha 10.35 kg/ha 5.63 kg/ha Chile
2010s 15.59 kg/ha 23.91 kg/ha 8.33 kg/ha Guatemala
2020s 18.75 kg/ha 26.58 kg/ha 7.84 kg/ha Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Chile or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 22.17 kg/ha against 20.1 kg/ha in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Chile and Guatemala?
2.07 kg/ha, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Guatemala rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
Chile ranks 45th and Guatemala ranks 42nd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Guatemala: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/chile/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/chile/guatemala/">Chile vs Guatemala: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,440 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).