Chile vs Yugoslav SFR: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Chile
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 20.24 kg/ha against 20.1 kg/ha in Chile, a difference of 0.14 kg/ha.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 45th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 44th of 186 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.84 kg/ha | 15.19 kg/ha | 13.35 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 1.82 kg/ha | 22.01 kg/ha | 20.19 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 2.74 kg/ha | 31.01 kg/ha | 28.26 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 6.42 kg/ha | 22.4 kg/ha | 15.98 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Chile or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 20.24 kg/ha against 20.1 kg/ha in Chile as of 1991.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Chile and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.14 kg/ha, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Chile and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Chile ranks 45th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 44th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).