Congo vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area

Congo
4.1 kg/ha
in 2023
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
3.98 kg/ha
in 2023
Congo rank
117th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
119th

Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Congo
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 4.1 kg/ha against 3.98 kg/ha in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.12 kg/ha.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.

Congo ranks 117th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 119th of 186 countries.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1960s 2.23 kg/ha 40.99 kg/ha 38.76 kg/ha Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1970s 4.05 kg/ha 116.57 kg/ha 112.52 kg/ha Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1980s 1.77 kg/ha 71.61 kg/ha 69.84 kg/ha Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1990s 1.65 kg/ha 126.88 kg/ha 125.23 kg/ha Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2000s 1.09 kg/ha 47.77 kg/ha 46.69 kg/ha Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2010s 0.9522 kg/ha 10.14 kg/ha 9.19 kg/ha Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2020s 3.14 kg/ha 5.39 kg/ha 2.25 kg/ha Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Congo or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Congo, at 4.1 kg/ha against 3.98 kg/ha in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2023.
What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Congo and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
0.12 kg/ha, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
Congo ranks 117th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 119th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/congo-rep/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/congo-rep/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Congo vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,440 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).