Costa Rica vs Iran (Islamic Republic of): Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area

Costa Rica
96.89 kg/ha
in 2023
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
2.83 kg/ha
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
8th
Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank
10th

Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Iran (Islamic Republic of)
0255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 96.89 kg/ha against 2.83 kg/ha in Iran (Islamic Republic of), a difference of 94.06 kg/ha.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 34.2 times Iran (Islamic Republic of)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 8th and Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 10th of 186 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Iran (Islamic Republic of) Difference Ahead
1960s 12.96 kg/ha 0.0923 kg/ha 12.87 kg/ha Costa Rica
1970s 30.31 kg/ha 0.0818 kg/ha 30.23 kg/ha Costa Rica
1980s 35.49 kg/ha 0.2233 kg/ha 35.27 kg/ha Costa Rica
1990s 72.39 kg/ha 1.42 kg/ha 70.97 kg/ha Costa Rica
2000s 103.94 kg/ha 5.61 kg/ha 98.33 kg/ha Costa Rica
2010s 88.4 kg/ha 2.61 kg/ha 85.78 kg/ha Costa Rica
2020s 99.98 kg/ha 2.52 kg/ha 97.46 kg/ha Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Costa Rica or Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
Costa Rica, at 96.89 kg/ha against 2.83 kg/ha in Iran (Islamic Republic of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Costa Rica and Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
94.06 kg/ha, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
Costa Rica ranks 8th and Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 10th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Iran (Islamic Republic of): Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/costa-rica/iran-islamic-republic-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/costa-rica/iran-islamic-republic-of/">Costa Rica vs Iran (Islamic Republic of): Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,440 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).