Croatia vs Iceland: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Croatia
- Iceland
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 18.89 kg/ha against 17.32 kg/ha in Iceland, a difference of 1.57 kg/ha.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Iceland ahead.
Croatia ranks 50th and Iceland ranks 53rd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24.77 kg/ha | 23.07 kg/ha | 1.69 kg/ha | Croatia |
| 2000s | 33.66 kg/ha | 19.66 kg/ha | 14.01 kg/ha | Croatia |
| 2010s | 21.05 kg/ha | 28.29 kg/ha | 7.24 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 2020s | 22.01 kg/ha | 24.33 kg/ha | 2.32 kg/ha | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Croatia or Iceland?
- Croatia, at 18.89 kg/ha against 17.32 kg/ha in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Croatia and Iceland?
- 1.57 kg/ha, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Iceland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Iceland rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Croatia ranks 50th and Iceland ranks 53rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).