Cuba vs Lesotho: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Lesotho
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 1.05 kg/ha against 0.9985 kg/ha in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0515 kg/ha.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 150th and Lesotho ranks 153rd of 185 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 33.1 kg/ha | 0.6894 kg/ha | 32.41 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1970s | 32.72 kg/ha | 0.7298 kg/ha | 31.99 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1980s | 50.59 kg/ha | 0.6643 kg/ha | 49.92 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 1990s | 15.8 kg/ha | 3.69 kg/ha | 12.11 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 7.01 kg/ha | 1.93 kg/ha | 5.08 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 9.05 kg/ha | 0.726 kg/ha | 8.32 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 2.39 kg/ha | 0.7838 kg/ha | 1.6 kg/ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Cuba or Lesotho?
- Cuba, at 1.05 kg/ha against 0.9985 kg/ha in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Cuba and Lesotho?
- 0.0515 kg/ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Lesotho?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Lesotho rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 150th and Lesotho ranks 153rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).