Cuba vs Pakistan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area

Cuba
1.05 kg/ha
in 2023
Pakistan
1.22 kg/ha
in 2023
Cuba rank
150th
Pakistan rank
147th

Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Cuba
  • Pakistan
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 1.22 kg/ha against 1.05 kg/ha in Cuba, a difference of 0.17 kg/ha.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 150th and Pakistan ranks 147th of 186 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 33.1 kg/ha 0.0138 kg/ha 33.09 kg/ha Cuba
1970s 32.72 kg/ha 0.0856 kg/ha 32.63 kg/ha Cuba
1980s 50.59 kg/ha 0.7773 kg/ha 49.81 kg/ha Cuba
1990s 15.8 kg/ha 0.5845 kg/ha 15.21 kg/ha Cuba
2000s 7.01 kg/ha 0.6836 kg/ha 6.32 kg/ha Cuba
2010s 9.05 kg/ha 1.07 kg/ha 7.99 kg/ha Cuba
2020s 2.39 kg/ha 1.43 kg/ha 0.9618 kg/ha Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Cuba or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 1.22 kg/ha against 1.05 kg/ha in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Cuba and Pakistan?
0.17 kg/ha, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Pakistan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
Cuba ranks 150th and Pakistan ranks 147th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Pakistan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/cuba/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/cuba/pakistan/">Cuba vs Pakistan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,440 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).