Czechia vs Sweden: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 7.8 kg/ha against 7.04 kg/ha in Czechia, a difference of 0.76 kg/ha.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Sweden ahead.
Czechia ranks 98th and Sweden ranks 96th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.18 kg/ha | 12.48 kg/ha | 2.3 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2000s | 9.63 kg/ha | 10.03 kg/ha | 0.3952 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2010s | 10.72 kg/ha | 8.06 kg/ha | 2.66 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 6.78 kg/ha | 9.01 kg/ha | 2.23 kg/ha | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Czechia or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 7.8 kg/ha against 7.04 kg/ha in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Czechia and Sweden?
- 0.76 kg/ha, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Sweden?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Sweden rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 98th and Sweden ranks 96th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).