Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Republic of Korea: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area

Democratic Republic of the Congo
0.2183 kg/ha
in 2023
Republic of Korea
51.35 kg/ha
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
18th
Republic of Korea rank
18th

Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Republic of Korea
0255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Republic of Korea currently reports 51.35 kg/ha against 0.2183 kg/ha in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 51.13 kg/ha.

That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 235.2 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Republic of Korea has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 18th and Republic of Korea ranks 18th of 18 countries.

Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0537 kg/ha 18.4 kg/ha 18.35 kg/ha Republic of Korea
1970s 0.1672 kg/ha 51.49 kg/ha 51.32 kg/ha Republic of Korea
1980s 0.1849 kg/ha 79.87 kg/ha 79.69 kg/ha Republic of Korea
1990s 0.1842 kg/ha 102.03 kg/ha 101.84 kg/ha Republic of Korea
2000s 0.0746 kg/ha 76.73 kg/ha 76.65 kg/ha Republic of Korea
2010s 0.1822 kg/ha 64.88 kg/ha 64.7 kg/ha Republic of Korea
2020s 0.1963 kg/ha 54 kg/ha 53.8 kg/ha Republic of Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Republic of Korea?
Republic of Korea, at 51.35 kg/ha against 0.2183 kg/ha in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Republic of Korea?
51.13 kg/ha, with Republic of Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Republic of Korea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Republic of Korea rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 18th and Republic of Korea ranks 18th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Republic of Korea: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/republic-of-korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-potassium-per-unit-area/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/republic-of-korea/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Republic of Korea: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,440 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).