Denmark vs Lithuania: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Denmark
- Lithuania
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 16.63 kg/ha against 15.25 kg/ha in Lithuania, a difference of 1.38 kg/ha.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 56th and Lithuania ranks 59th of 201 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35.11 kg/ha | 8.38 kg/ha | 26.73 kg/ha | Denmark |
| 2000s | 26.69 kg/ha | 15.11 kg/ha | 11.58 kg/ha | Denmark |
| 2010s | 20.59 kg/ha | 17.02 kg/ha | 3.57 kg/ha | Denmark |
| 2020s | 22.08 kg/ha | 17.14 kg/ha | 4.94 kg/ha | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Denmark or Lithuania?
- Denmark, at 16.63 kg/ha against 15.25 kg/ha in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Denmark and Lithuania?
- 1.38 kg/ha, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Denmark and Lithuania rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Denmark ranks 56th and Lithuania ranks 59th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).