Dominica vs Eritrea: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Dominica
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0.0012 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Dominica, a difference of 0.0012 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Dominica ahead.
Dominica ranks 177th and Eritrea ranks 176th of 186 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 57.55 kg/ha | 0.0037 kg/ha | 57.55 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 2000s | 13.84 kg/ha | 0.0038 kg/ha | 13.83 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 2010s | 7.38 kg/ha | 0.0032 kg/ha | 7.38 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 2020s | 4.22 kg/ha | 0.0009 kg/ha | 4.22 kg/ha | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area, Dominica or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 0.0012 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Dominica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area between Dominica and Eritrea?
- 0.0012 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Eritrea rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Dominica ranks 177th and Eritrea ranks 176th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).